By Staff
In a provocative exploration of global finance, the ongoing discourse surrounding President Trump’s actions regarding Iran marks a pivotal moment in the long-standing struggle between traditional financial empires and the emerging realm of digital currencies. Central to this narrative is the historical financial dominance wielded by the British Empire, which has controlled global monetary systems for over a century. Trump’s bold maneuvers could signal a transformative shift in this age-old dynamic.
For decades, the British financial system has crafted global trade frameworks to serve its interests, particularly through the mechanisms of the Sterling area and its influence in post-World War II economic structures. According to the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), the City of London has functioned as a key node in a network of financial control, employing tactics such as sanctions and leveraging the dollar to maintain dominance over sovereign nations. This intricate web has positioned Britain to influence oil trade and other essential commodities by controlling critical chokepoints, such as the Strait of Hormuz.
Approximately 20% of global oil transit flows through the Strait, making it one of the world’s most valuable commodities. In a recent video presentation from Promethean Action, Susan Kokinda argued that Trump’s confrontational stance towards Iran, including his demand to reopen the Strait under the threat of military action, represents more than mere geopolitical maneuvering; it challenges established financial norms. Analysts note that Trump’s ultimatum illustrates a strategic pivot aimed at disrupting longstanding financial arrangements.
Kokinda emphasizes Trump’s declaration that “leaders of countries, especially the United States, will never be extorted,” framing it as a rallying cry against what he perceives as “world extortion.” His assertion that “Make a deal or not, makes no difference to me. And the reason is because we’ve won,” reflects a newfound assertiveness in American foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests while resisting external pressures and expectations, including those from critics who suggest his actions are reckless and even call for the invocation of the 25th Amendment.
Read the full article in the Winter 2026 RECAP issue of Rounder Magazine
