Mike Postle : Cordeiro’s Argument “Inconsistent With The Law”

By Evert Caldwell, Rounder Life News Team

In a ten page response to Marle Cordeiro’s “Opposition” to Mike Postle’s Motion to Dismiss (lawsuit filed in Nevada), attorney Joseph N. Mott, of the law firm Maier Gutierrez & Associates, which represents Postle, suggests Cordeiro failed to make the case for jurisdiction in Nevada.

Read Marle Cordeiro’s Opposition To Mike Postle’s Motion To Dismiss.

Mott argues, “Marle’s Opposition makes a case that Kings Casino, LLC d/b/a Stones Gambling Hall (“Stones”) could be subject to jurisdiction in Nevada but does not allege facts sufficient for the Court to exercise jurisdiction over Michael. Marle has consistently alleged that although the complained of conduct all occurred in California, Michael should nevertheless be subject to Nevada jurisdiction because a third party broadcast the alleged misconduct. This argument is inconsistent with the law governing personal jurisdiction.”

Read Mike Postle’s Full Reply.

“Marle’s Complaint merely alleges that she was invited to California to participate in a Stone’s poker broadcast, but does not allege that Michael was the person who invited her nor that he had anything to do with her invitation.”

Related – An article on Pokernews.com suggested “whistleblower’ Veronica Brill had a hand in inviting Cordeiro to play at Stones, when it alluded to an interview Joey Ingram conducted with Brill.

“Ingram wondered why she participated in inviting Matt BerkeyChristian Soto, and Marle Cordeiro to play on the stream with Postle…” – Frank Op de Woerd via Poker News.

Mott goes on to state, “Ultimately, Marle has completely failed to allege any specific conduct by Michael directed to Nevada, let alone that he knew that harm would occur in Nevada based on his actions. Instead, she is attempting to conflate Stones’ conduct – broadcast of live poker games and inviting her to travel to California to play poker – to Michael in an attempt to manufacture jurisdiction. Unfortunately for Marle, the standard is that Michael himself must have committed an intentional act directed at Nevada, not merely that he participated in a broadcast that someone else directed at Nevada.”

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Continuing Coverage of Our Investigation

New Numbers Cast Doubt On Postlegate

Rounder Report : Breakdown Of Mike Postle July 20, 2019 Stream At Stones

Postle May Have Played Regularly At Other Casino

Even When Gump And John S. Get It Right, They’re Wrong

Video : Watch Mike Postle Receive $2,000 In Non-Reported Add-ons During May 18, 2019 Session At Stones

Breakdown of Mike Postle May 18, 2019 Stream At Stones : $2,000 In Non-Reported Add-ons Highlight Major Reporting Flaws

Mike Postle Re-loads Twice In A Session He Plays With Bart Hanson : No Mention Of Non-Reported Add-ons In Interview With Win Rate Graph Creator John S.

I Told Mike Postle To “Make Some Money With The Moneymaker, From The Moneymaker”

Evidence Supports Mike Postle’s Version Of Infamous “Moneymaker Hand”

Mike Postle “Smoking Gun” Cheating Theory Flops With New Revelations

Allegations Against Justin Kuraitis Don’t Add Up – Postle Books Big Wins When He’s Out Of Town – Responds To Lawsuit

Mike Postle Asks Court To Dismiss Complaint

Reporter’s Errors Lead To Misreported Facts In Postlegate

Unearthed Evidence Exposes Major Error In Lawsuit Allegations

New Revelations Deflate “Postlegate” Narrative

Mike Postle Not Making All The right Moves Video

Statistics In ‘Postlegate” Completely Fabricated

In 2007 Rounder Magazine recognized Mike Postle as an elite pro and provided him with merchandise to promote the Rounder brand. No other considerations have been provided. Mr. Postle has never had ownership rights, nor has he ever been employed by Rounder. Rounder Life Media is not in a position to determine Mike Postle's guilt or innocence. This will be determined by the official investigation(s) being conducted, or through a court of law, not speculation. We will continue to pursue all relevant facts related to this case and report such, whether they support or disprove the charges.